Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Acoustic & Vibration
      • Avionics
      • Data Acquisition
      • Defense
      • Drones & Air Taxis
      • Electric & Hybrid
      • EMC
      • Engine Testing
      • Environmental Testing
    • F-L
      • Fatigue Testing
      • Flight Testing
      • Helicopters & Rotorcraft
      • High Speed Imaging
      • Industry News
    • M-S
      • Materials Testing
      • NDT
      • Simulation & Training
      • Software
      • Space
      • Structural Testing
      • Supplier News
    • T-Z
      • Technology
      • Telemetry & Communications
      • Weapons Testing
      • Wind Tunnels
  • Features
  • Magazines
    • March 2025
    • Dec 2024/Jan 2025
    • Showcase 2025
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Aerospace Test & Development Show
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier Spotlights
    • Press Releases
    • Technical Papers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
Subscribe to magazine Subscribe to email newsletter Media Pack
Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
  • News
      • Acoustic & Vibration
      • Avionics
      • Data Acquisition
      • Defense
      • Drones & Air Taxis
      • Electric & Hybrid
      • EMC
      • Engine Testing
      • Environmental Testing
      • Fatigue Testing
      • Flight Testing
      • Helicopters & Rotorcraft
      • High Speed Imaging
      • Industry News
      • Materials Testing
      • NDT
      • Simulation & Training
      • Software
      • Space
      • Structural Testing
      • Supplier News
      • Technology
      • Telemetry & Communications
      • Weapons Testing
      • Wind Tunnels
  • Features
  • Magazines
    1. March 2025
    2. Dec 2024/Jan 2025
    3. Showcase 2025
    4. September 2024
    5. June 2024
    6. March 2024
    7. Archive Issues
    8. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    19th March 2025

    In this issue: March 2025

    Online Magazines By Ben Sampson
    Recent

    In this issue: March 2025

    19th March 2025
    contents and front cover of magazine

    In this issue: December / January 2025

    19th December 2024
    Showcase 2025

    In this issue – Showcase 2025

    6th November 2024
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Aerospace Test & Development Show
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier Spotlights
    • Press Releases
    • Technical Papers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
Opinion

Out with the old

Opinion WritersBy Opinion Writers10th June 20164 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

Garnet Ridgway says: Suggesting there are ‘no new accidents’ is a gross simplification and shows a lack of appreciation for the complexity of modern aerospace systems.

In an accident’s aftermath, all stakeholders are highly motivated to get answers; however, this is not the same as actually understanding what went wrong. For example, jumping to the conclusion ‘pilot error’ is a very easy and may superficially explain the sequence of events before an accident. 

Consider the case of a military training aircraft flown by a novice pilot, which suffered an undercarriage failure immediately after touchdown. The investigation revealed the undercarriage lever was not set to the ‘locked’ detent; as far as the investigators were concerned, this was classic pilot error: case closed. However, that did not explain why the same issue occurred on two more occasions shortly afterward, despite changes to the training syllabus to emphasize the importance of locking the undercarriage before touchdown. Further investigation revealed that the touchdown ‘bump’ (in the hands of a student pilot) was sufficient to cause the undercarriage lever to leave the ‘locked’ detent of its own accord – a totally unacceptable design flaw for a training aircraft. The initial assessment of ‘pilot error’ was completely plausible, and completely wrong. As with the vast majority of accidents, it was in fact a totally new linkage between a hazard, a cause and an outcome.

A positive aspect of accident investigation is that the aerospace testing community is very good at learning from past mistakes – once accurately identified. Once a mitigation is in place and previous accident knowledge has permeated into the testing community’s thinking, it is extremely unlikely that it will happen again. This further supports the conjecture that there are, in fact, lots of ‘new’ accidents, as the causes of the ‘old’ are being iterated out of existence through mitigation strategies and measures.

It is human nature for previous accident knowledge to steer the investigation of new ones, but it can lead to tempting false conclusions. The challenge is accepting that not all accidents are ‘old’ accidents, and to avoid the pitfalls of assigning broad terms that give quick answers, but fall short of providing genuine understanding of causes.

Garnet Ridgway has a PhD from the UK’s University of Liverpool. He has designed cockpit instruments for Airbus and currently works for a leading UK-based aircraft test and evaluation organization

Sophie Robinson says: The history of accidents in aerospace testing is long and varied, stretching back to the earliest pioneers of aviation and touching the aircraft of the future. 

Lt Thomas Selfridge was the first person killed in an aviation accident as a passenger during a demonstration of the Wright Flyer II in 1908. Aircraft accidents have become less frequent over time as both the technology available and our understanding of aviation safety have increased, and aerospace testing-related accidents in particular have become a newsworthy rarity; recent fatal incidents involving Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo and the prototype Finmeccanica AW609 tiltrotor made headlines around the world. In between these events, aerospace testing accidents have been numerous; surely, by now, we’ve seen everything there is to see, and everything that could go wrong, has?

Analysis of causal factors behind aircraft accidents reveals distinct trends in testing for both the civilian and military spheres. The human factor is the largest and most worrisome trend from recent years. Increasingly complex flight systems, aircrew fatigue and inconsistent training and regulation emerge as constant themes throughout air crash investigations. Evidence of repeated mistakes suggests that not all accidents in testing are new, and that changes to procedure and training are required to further reduce our accident rate. It is unsurprisingly that the same mistakes are repeatedly made within the testing community. We are, after all, trained in similar ways, from similar backgrounds, frequently working on similar projects, so it is not too surprising that similar things go wrong.

If we recognize mistakes are being made, what are we doing to prevent future accidents and further reduce test flying risks? Engineers commonly participate in the ‘learning from experience’ (LFE) process; both positive and negative issues and experiences during trials are documented. After completed tests, this knowledge is fed to the wider engineering community so that issues can either be mitigated or prevented in future. A positive, pro-active safety culture is driving a reduction in testing accidents. As this rate iterates toward zero, a time will come when testing accidents are confined to the history books.

Sophie Robinson works at the front line of aerospace testing as a rotary-wing performance and flying qualities engineer for a leading UK-based aircraft test organization. She also holds a PhD in aerospace engineering from the University of Liverpool

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleAstronaut enters BEAM module on ISS
Next Article NIFTI no wires
Opinion Writers

Related Posts

Materials Testing

Giving green thrusters a boost

15th April 20256 Mins Read
Gerard Van Es, Principal Advisor of Flight Safety and Operations at NLR
Opinion

Academic Insight: Testing to help stop runway overruns

1st April 20254 Mins Read
NDT

Q&A: Daniel Richard, Solutions Development Expert, Eddyfi Technologies

3rd March 202514 Mins Read
Latest Posts

Industry Adoption of 3D Optical Surface Gauges

21st May 2025

NDT: Robotics and software spur innovation

21st May 2025

Wisk and NASA to partner on US autonomous flight operations and standards

20th May 2025
Supplier Spotlights
Our Social Channels
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Getting in Touch
  • Subscribe To Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Meet the Team
  • Media Pack
Related Topics
  • Aircraft Interiors
  • Business Jet Interiors
FREE WEEKLY NEWS EMAIL!

Get the 'best of the week' from this website direct to your inbox every Wednesday

© 2023 Mark Allen Group Ltd | All Rights Reserved
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.