Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
  • News
    • A-E
      • Acoustic & Vibration
      • Avionics
      • Data Acquisition
      • Defense
      • Drones & Air Taxis
      • Electric & Hybrid
      • EMC
      • Engine Testing
      • Environmental Testing
    • F-L
      • Fatigue Testing
      • Flight Testing
      • Helicopters & Rotorcraft
      • High Speed Imaging
      • Industry News
    • M-S
      • Materials Testing
      • NDT
      • Simulation & Training
      • Software
      • Space
      • Structural Testing
      • Supplier News
    • T-Z
      • Technology
      • Telemetry & Communications
      • Weapons Testing
      • Wind Tunnels
  • Features
  • Magazines
    • March 2025
    • Dec 2024/Jan 2025
    • Showcase 2025
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Aerospace Test & Development Show
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier Spotlights
    • Press Releases
    • Technical Papers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
Subscribe to magazine Subscribe to email newsletter Media Pack
Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
  • News
      • Acoustic & Vibration
      • Avionics
      • Data Acquisition
      • Defense
      • Drones & Air Taxis
      • Electric & Hybrid
      • EMC
      • Engine Testing
      • Environmental Testing
      • Fatigue Testing
      • Flight Testing
      • Helicopters & Rotorcraft
      • High Speed Imaging
      • Industry News
      • Materials Testing
      • NDT
      • Simulation & Training
      • Software
      • Space
      • Structural Testing
      • Supplier News
      • Technology
      • Telemetry & Communications
      • Weapons Testing
      • Wind Tunnels
  • Features
  • Magazines
    1. March 2025
    2. Dec 2024/Jan 2025
    3. Showcase 2025
    4. September 2024
    5. June 2024
    6. March 2024
    7. Archive Issues
    8. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    19th March 2025

    In this issue: March 2025

    Online Magazines By Ben Sampson
    Recent

    In this issue: March 2025

    19th March 2025
    contents and front cover of magazine

    In this issue: December / January 2025

    19th December 2024
    Showcase 2025

    In this issue – Showcase 2025

    6th November 2024
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Events
    • All Events
    • Aerospace Test & Development Show
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Suppliers
    • Supplier Spotlights
    • Press Releases
    • Technical Papers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
Aerospace Testing InternationalAerospace Testing International
Features Space Uncategorized

How sustainable biofuel will power the next generation of rockets

Web TeamBy Web Team31st August 20228 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email
bluShift engine testing
Static fire testing of bluShift’s Marvel 2.0 engine, which burns non-toxic, carbon-neutral, bio-derived solid fuel (Photo: bluShift)

By Paul Willis

During March this year bluShift Aerospace, a space rocket startup based in the US state of Maine, released footage of the first full-scale test of its hybrid engine.

The partial power test lasted only five seconds. It was preceded a year earlier by a test flight of a scaled version of bluShift’s Stardust rocket. The test flight saw the rocket fired a mile into the sky in the depths of the Maine winter, before parachuting safely to Earth. It was the first ever commercial rocket launch powered by a bio-derived fuel.

Sascha Deri, bluShift’s founder, has remained tight-lipped about the feedstock for the biofuel, revealing only that he discovered it during a visit to his brother’s farm and that the solid fuel is widely available worldwide and is completely non-toxic.

To prove the non-toxicity Deri has even eaten the fuel. “Calorie-wise it has no benefits to humans, it just passes through you,” says Deri. “But, hey, I’m still here!”

Green credentials

BluShift isn’t the only startup developing a biofuel powered rocket. Scottish launch company Skyrora is developing a rocket engine powered by kerosene produced from plastics waste. In 2020 it completed a test flight that reached an altitude of 16 miles from the Langanes Peninsula, Iceland.

Skyrora XL
Artist’s impression of the Skyrora XL, which is expected to launch for the first time early next year (Image: Skyrora)

UK-based propulsion engine maker Reaction Engines last November announced a partnership with the UK Government to develop a biofuel engine powered by cracked ammonia. But many are asking if a shift to biofuels is even necessary when space flight represents such a tiny proportion of aeronautical activity.

Filippo Maggi, associate professor of aerospace engineering at Politecnico di Milano in Italy believes the changes are worthwhile, not least because of the anticipated growth in space flight. This could increase the environmental impact of the launch industry.

“If you look at the business plans of these companies that are talking about continuous launches, it is going to be a little challenging from an environmental viewpoint,” says Maggi.

Virgin Galactic, for example, initially planned to send groups into space every 32 hours. The growth in small-scale satellites, known as cubesats and space tourism is also fueling an unprecedent-ed demand for more cost-effective launch services.

Even with the growth in space travel factored in, the predicted greenhouse gas emissions from space activity is less than that of most other industries. Of more concern believes Maggi is polluting the stratosphere with contaminants. These can take many years to clear and may lead to ozone depletion.

Putting real world impacts aside, shifting to biofuels also has symbolic value. “From the environmental viewpoint you are not changing anything dramatically, but you are planting a flag,” says Maggi. “And the space community wants to be seen as the community that makes this kind of effort.”

Sustainability responsibility

Deri’s interest in biofuels is part of a commitment to sustainability that began with altE Store, a US distributor of renewable energy products that he founded in 1999 and which now has an annual turnover of nearly US$30 million.

He launched bluShift in 2014 in his home state of Maine after discovering that the local government was offering grants and funding for aerospace companies.

Prototype rocket
bluShift successfully launched a prototype rocket from Maine in January 2021 (Photo: bluShift)

“The night skies are very clear in Maine and growing up here I developed a strong curiosity about the universe,” says Deri, who has a bachelors in physics. “In a way it has come full circle for me as I get to fulfil the passion I had as a kid but do it in a way that is fundamentally more Earth-responsible.”

In the six years between bluShift’s launch and their first sub-orbital flight, Deri and his team spent close to four years refining the fuel recipe.

Once they were happy with the fuel mix a further 18 months was spent “getting the engine technology to work right”, Deri says. After that, they had just nine months to build the pro-totype rocket, find customers to offset the cost of the launch, find a launch site, obtain the necessary permissions and build a launch rail system.

The rocket’s engine is hybrid, which means that it uses a mix of solid and liquid fuel. This contrasts with most space rocket engines which typically use a mix of liquid propellants, often refined kerosene known as RP-1, which is combined with an oxidizer such as liquid oxygen (LOX).

“The solid fuel is on the inside of the combustion chamber and the oxidizer is a liquid. It burns from the inside out,” says Deri.

Unlike many rocket fuel propellants the fuel is extremely stable, says Deri.

“It takes some effort to get it going but just like a wood fire, once you get it going and open up the entry points of oxygen, it burns very nicely.”

Safety and cost

The stability of the fuel offers several advantages, not least of which is safety.

“It is really hard for a hybrid rocket to blow up because you have two different states of matter – a liquid and a solid – and the solid has a really hard time atomizing. So the moment you cut off the oxygen, the engine just shuts down.”

The stability of the fuel mix also significantly cuts down on R&D costs, says Deri, since “you don’t need all the precautions you need when you’re dealing with refined kerosene.” Their development costs are further lowered by using a non-cryogenic oxidizer.

He says, “If you look at our competitors they are spending at bare minimum twice what we have spent, and it is probably more like 10 to 20 times, to get to where we are today.”

However, compared to traditional fuel mixes Deri’s biofuel mix has a much lower specific impulse – the measure of how much thrust can be produced in relation to volume. As a re-sult, bluShift’s engine needs to be much larger to generate enough power to propel itself into orbit. The result is a much bulkier rocket for the same size payload.

“It’s like building a minivan to go to space as opposed to a Formula One racing car,” says Deri. “It is going to cost us a whole lot less to build.”

Skyrora test site
Skyrora’s engine test site in Scotland consists of a fuel and oxidiser loading system and pressure supply system to feed fuel to the engine on the test stand (Photo: Skyrora)

Transparent fuel

Other startups are being more transparent about the ingredients of their biofuel. Skyrora’s kerosene fuel mix is called ecosene and is made from four different plastics: high and low density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene.

The waste plastics undergo three stages to create the kerosene. Pyrolysis creates an oil-based sludge, hydrotreatment distils out different fuels and gases and then it is refined. Unlike bluShift, Skyrora’s biofuel closely resembles RP-1 grade kerosene and has not influenced the design of the propulsion system. However, their choice of propellant has changed the design of the engine.

“We have chosen high test peroxide [HTP] as our oxidizer, meaning we have to decompose it to water and oxygen,” says Jack-James Marlow, head of engineering UK at Skyrora.

“This process uses a catalyst and releases heat. We can use this heat to start the combustion process, meaning we do not need a separate igniter system like most engines.

Skyrora engine testing
Skyrora engine test facility

Skyrora’s engine testing facility in Fife, Scotland, where a full series of engine tests have been conducted (Photo: Skyrora)

“It also means our turbo-pump turbine can be operated from decomposed HTP alone, simplifying the overall design. The use of HTP also means our exhaust products contain approximately 40% less CO products than standard LOX / hydrocarbon engines.”

Marlow adds that after running the biofuel through development testing with their engine they were able to achieve “identical performance” to standard kerosene.

Air-breathing ammonia

Another potential biofuel for rocket propulsion is ammonia.

Oxfordshire-based Reaction Engines is using the heat exchanger system developed for its SABRE engine – an air-breathing rocket engine under development – to create an engine fueled by cracked ammonia.

While ammonia is hard to burn, it can be catalytically cracked to produce hydrogen. The idea is to create an engine with an ammonia cracker incorporated into it. Tom Scrope, chief financial officer at Reaction Engines says, “The concept is to crack a portion of the ammonia, separate out the nitrogen and hydrogen and then recombine the hydrogen with the ammonia in situ, using the hydrogen as an igniter for the ammonia.”

Ammonia as a biofuel offers several advantages. Not only is it zero carbon, it is also widely available thanks to use in agricultural fertilizer and is far more stable and easier to handle than hydrogen.

However, while Reaction Engines’ background is in rocket propulsion, the ammonia cracker engine is unlikely to find an application there. Ammonia’s specific impulse cannot compete with current rocket fuel propellants. Furthermore, as a solid fuel it would likely “add dry mass to the launch vehicle causing a corresponding payload penalty,” says Scrope.

“As such, ammonia cracking is better for applications where a true zero-carbon fuel is desired, and efficiency is a stronger driver than system mass – the maritime or aviation industries, for example,” Scrope adds.

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleUK rocket company Orbex to hire 50 staff over next six months
Next Article Saab successfully fires Meteor missile from Gripen E fighter during test
Web Team

Related Posts

News

Astrolight raises €2.8m to build optical space communications network

22nd May 20253 Mins Read
Features

NDT: Robotics and software spur innovation

21st May 20258 Mins Read
News

US range opened to boost hypersonic and laser weapon testing

19th May 20252 Mins Read
Latest Posts

Astrolight raises €2.8m to build optical space communications network

22nd May 2025

Industry Adoption of 3D Optical Surface Gauges

21st May 2025

NDT: Robotics and software spur innovation

21st May 2025
Supplier Spotlights
Our Social Channels
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Getting in Touch
  • Subscribe To Magazine
  • Contact Us
  • Meet the Team
  • Media Pack
Related Topics
  • Aircraft Interiors
  • Business Jet Interiors
FREE WEEKLY NEWS EMAIL!

Get the 'best of the week' from this website direct to your inbox every Wednesday

© 2023 Mark Allen Group Ltd | All Rights Reserved
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.